Tag Archives: Probate

To Do List Upon Death of Family Member

The October 2012 issue of Consumer Reports highlights numerous steps one can take upon the passing of a family member or loved one.  Among the listed items, some steps are overlooked and cause greater anguish and financial difficulty for those who survive the decedent.

Consultation

While many employers receive word that an employee has passed, few surviving family members contact human resources or employe benefits coordinators.  Employer specialists can quickly begin the process of obtaining benefits and providing any pay due.  Certain financial institutions “drag their feet” when it comes time to pay out benefits so starting the pay-out process sooner is always beneficial.

Many family members fail to look for prepaid burial plans or other arrangements made by the decedent during lifetime.  If the decedent already paid for funeral services, the mortuary will pick-up the body and assist the family members with the completion of vital tasks. The mortuary or funeral home will help obtain death certificates and can assist in the coordination of the memorial or funeral service. As with many industries, the costs of these services have risen such that a prepaid plan can result in significant savings.

Hopefully, you are well aware of your loved ones’ wishes such that you will know whether a prepaid plan is in effect.  If not, you should at least know where the decedent kept important documents such as a trust, will, and financial documents.  If you have no idea where such important information is kept by your loved one, you should discuss the matter soon.  For assistance discussing these sensitive matters, you can contact an estate planning attorney today.

Jason C. Morris, Esq.

Joe Paterno’s Will Reveals Little More Than Revocable Living Trust

Today, closing arguments are being held in the jury trial of accused sex offender Jerry Sandusky.  His former boss, legendary Penn State football coach Joe Paterno, has created intrigue in an unrelated legal matter.  Paterno’s family sought court protection to seal Paterno’s will from public disclosure. After a local newspaper filed a motion to unseal the will, Paterno’s family made public his 1997 will and 2010 codicil to the will.

ImageAfter reviewing the contents to the will and the codicil, there is nothing surprising or notable about their contents.  The family’s efforts to seal the testamentary documents seem unreasonable and misguided.  Typically, wills must be lodged with the county court or probate department before the decedent’s assets may be distributed.  Paterno’s will is a pour-over will meaning it directs any probate assets to be poured over to a revocable living trust.  Most likely, the Paterno revocable living trust specifies the distribution of Paterno’s assets.

A revocable living trust is advantageous because you do not need to lodge the trust with the court.  The administration of the trust and distribution of the estate can take place outside of public review and records.  In addition, with advances in medicine and technology, individuals are living beyond their ability to manage their financial affairs.  Revocable living trusts allow successor trustees to take over and manage the financial affairs of those suffering from diminished capacity.

Living trusts are only effective insofar as you title the assets properly.  Your assets should be titled in the name of the trust.  The Paterno will, a pour-over will, acts as a backstop in the event that an asset is not titled properly in the name of the trust.   Any asset that is not transferred into a living trust must pass through probate first prior to its distribution.  Oddly, the Paterno family has not filed a petition to initiate a probate of any assets.  The family efforts to seal the will and codicil appear unnecessary and unusual. As with the Sandusky trial, the Paterno will story may end this week. Or, future court proceedings may loom ahead.

Upside Down and Topsy Turvy

It is unfortunately all too common these days that a house or other asset is worth less than the mortgage owed on it. What happens if the owner dies, leaving the upside down asset to a spouse or children?

There’s good news and bad news. The good news is that the heirs of the deceased can still inherit title to the asset via probate (if it is held in the deceased’s name) or via a deed from the successor trustee (if it is held by a trust). The bad news is the lender will not simply allow the heirs to make payments on the same mortgage. The lender’s agreement to loan was with the deceased, based on his or her credit history and income. Any heir would have to pay off the debt or obtain a new loan; and the trouble is, of course, that a lender will not want to lend more than the asset is worth.

Is there a solution? If the asset is significantly over-encumbered, it doesn’t make sense to bother transferring title to the heir. Instead, you can just allow the asset to be foreclosed upon or repossessed. If the asset has some sentimental value and is not significantly over-encumbered, you can pay off the debt, or pay it down to an acceptable level and borrow the rest—if your credit is good and you are able to get a loan. I had a client whose mother died, leaving a luxury car worth about $39,000 with a debt of $42,000. My client was herself wealthy and decided simply to pay off the debt and take title to the car. Not many people can afford to do this, however.

If you are confronting this issue, you should contact a qualified Nevada probate attorney.

By Sharon M. Parker

Will I Be Disinherited If I Challenge the Will?

Most wills and trusts contain a provision that says something like this: “If any beneficiary hereunder shall attack this last will and testament, such beneficiary’s share shall be thereby revoked and such beneficiary shall receive nothing” or “If anyone shall challenge this document, I leave such person $1.00.” This type of clause is known as a “no contest” or “in terrorem” clause; the latter is Latin meaning to frighten someone. In other words, the person making the will or trust includes this clause in order to scare beneficiaries or would-be beneficiaries from initiating a legal challenge or contest to the will or trust.

Are no contest clauses actually enforceable? In Nevada, they are enforceable, but with some significant caveats. First, no heir will be disinherited for asking a court to enforce the terms of the will, or enforcing that person’s legal rights under the will or trust. Moreover, it is perfectly legitimate for an heir to petition the court for instructions with respect to how the will should be interpreted. Second, regardless of the no contest clause, an heir who, in good faith, has probable cause to believe that the will was invalid, may bring an action challenging the will without fear of being disinherited, provided that he or she meets the standards set forth in Nevada’s probate code.

Does this defeat the intention of the person who made the will? Hopefully not. No contest clauses are designed to threaten family members who got less than their “fair” share—for example, where someone is intentionally omitted or got less than his brothers or sisters. The trouble is that if no one could legally challenge a will without being disinherited, then many families would be out of luck in situations involving undue influence. For example, a caretaker or perhaps a girlfriend or recently acquired spouse may unduly influence a sick or dying person, swaying or even coercing the susceptible testator to execute a will leaving nothing to family members. Nevada’s law on no contest clauses is intended to balance the interests of those who are of sound mind and memory and want to give uneven shares to their family members with the interests of those who are sick and susceptible to undue influence when they execute their wills.

If you have questions, you should contact a qualified Nevada probate attorney.

By Sharon M. Parker, Esq.

Online Estate Planning

Today, I can roll out of bed and with a few clicks on my phone, transfer money from my checking account to my online savings account, purchase a song on iTunes, and make a payment on my power bill. Years ago, each of these discrete activities would have required separate trips to various businesses. At the very least, each activity could not be accomplished online.

The shift to a virtual world directly affects our everyday lives and what occurs at our death. With the explosion of social media and increasingly more powerful smartphones, the significance of our online presence is not limited to financial accounts. Social media giants like Twitter and Facebook have adopted deceased user policies. Prior to the Virginia Tech massacre in 2007, Facebook automatically closed down user profiles after death. Students, families, and friends objected to this policy because they wanted to leave tributes and messages on the shooting victims’ profiles. Now, following notice of a deceased user, Facebook allows profiles to be “memorialized,” or changed into tribute pages without certain personal information.

Heirs may want to maintain sites or blogs with special sentimental value such as photo sharing sites like Kodak Gallery, Shutterfly, and Flickr. Many blog creators and Twitter users have hundreds if not thousands of followers. With all of the time and effort expended in creating and posting interesting content, the users would not likely want their online presence to vanish immediately upon their passing.

Can a surviving spouse access any of the online accounts mentioned above? For years, consumer advocates warned of the pitfalls of keeping a written list of our passwords. Create strong passwords with numbers, letters, symbols, and capitalized letters! Do not share your passwords with anyone! However, this caution-filled advice can create problems at death. I confronted this dilemma recently when a client sought to bequeath his online gaming account to a designated beneficiary. The client determined it was best if our office kept the login information rather than give the information to the designated trustee. The client confessed that he did not want the trustee to see how much he had expended (lost) on the hobby. For good reason, many of us would not want our loved ones to access our email and other online accounts.

Therein lies the dilemma. Several companies offer a potential solution. Three main competitors, AssetLock.net, Legacy Locker, and Deathswitch.com, are online services that allow users the ability to pass on their online assets. The companies give account access to various designated beneficiaries by giving the beneficiaries your passwords and can send final messages to friends. The online companies charge yearly or lifetime fees to act as your digital personal representatives. The conundrum is that these services will require human “verifiers” that the account holder is deceased and the online assets should be distributed.

The procedure for obtaining online account access can be even more burdensome if someone is incapacitated. If the incapacitated person has not executed a power of attorney, his or her spouse or family will need a guardian or conservator appointed. This may not suffice as certain financial institutions will require a court order customized to the particular account. All of these predicaments beg the question: What to do?

Individuals could give a lawyer or dependable relative all of the online account information. If you are fortunate to have several trustworthy loved ones, you could split up your accounts among a group of different people. The tried-and-true approach of leaving vital, important documents in a home safe or safety-deposit box could work well too. However, ensure that someone can access the safe or deposit box. At the very least, you should maintain a list of your online accounts and the domain names and inform someone where the list is.

Even if you have permission to use a spouse or family member’s online accounts during life, legally you may not be able to access their accounts after death. Notify the service provider so that others do not prey upon the account. Such notification will stop online bill pay services and other automated transactions. For those collecting Social Security benefits, loved ones must return any payments received after a recipient passes away. Benefits are often paid through direct deposit which should be stopped by notifying the bank and the Social Security Administration of the recipient’s death.

The law is sluggish in maintaining pace with the rapid evolution of online services. Clients and their counsel must be aware of the looming issues before losing Face(book) and turning to Google for solutions. If you have questions or concerns, you should contact an estate planning attorney.

This article appears in the December 13 edition of Northern Nevada Business Weekly.