Tag Archives: California

Morris Passes California Bar

Jason C. Morris, an associate specializing in estate planning, passed the February 2012 California Bar Exam.  Mr. Morris drafts trusts and wills for clients ranging from basic wills to complex trusts with generation skipping transfer tax planning. Mr. Morris also advises fiduciaries, personal representatives and trustees, in probates and trust administrations.  Woodburn and Wedge is continuing to accept representation of clients residing or doing business in California.

Open Shop in Reno, Save Taxes

ImageThe New York Times recently reported on Apple’s tax strategy which involves funneling profits through a Nevada corporation with offices in Reno, Nevada.  Apple has wisely taken advantage of Nevada’s non-existent corporate tax. In addition, Nevada does not have a corporate capital gains tax. While the tech giant is based out of Cupertino, California, Apple maintains a Reno office to collect and invest profits from its worldwide sales of iPods, iPhones, iPads, etc.

Estimates peg Apple’s current fiscal year profits at $46 billion, expected to be a record for an American business.  By largely avoiding California’s corporate tax rate of 8.84 percent, the tax savings are substantial.  Apple is not alone in seeking refuge in Nevada from the onerous California tax rates.  Microsoft operates a revenue recording center in Reno, Nevada to avoid the state of Washington’s royalty tax.

Not only does Nevada have low, or non-existent corporate tax rates, but also Nevada’s corporate laws are second-to-none.  Just a few of the protections afforded to Nevada entities are featured here.  If Apple and Microsoft embrace doing business in Nevada, should others consider following their lead?

Nevada Trust Income Subject to California State Income Tax

A Nevada trust may become subject to California state income tax depending on the residence of the trustee or beneficiaries of the trust.  An individual is a California resident if he or she is in that state for other than a temporary or transitory purpose, or if he or she is domiciled in California but is outside the state for a temporary or transitory purpose. Cal. Code Regs., tit. 18, § 17014, subd. (a).  California regulations provide that the income of a trust is subject to California income tax “if the fiduciary or beneficiary (other than a beneficiary whose interest in such trust is contingent) is a resident, regardless of the residence of the settlor.”  § 17742(a). Therefore, even if the trust creator (settlor) is a Nevada resident, the trust income can be subject to California tax based on the residence of the trustee or beneficiary.

If a Nevada trust has two trustees, one trustee is a Nevada resident and one trustee is a California resident, then one-half of the trust income is subject to California income tax.  Where the taxability of trust income depends on the residence of the fiduciary and there are two or more fiduciaries, the taxable income is apportioned according to the number of fiduciaries resident in California.  § 17743.

For those who may be considering a California financial institution as a trustee, this could subject the trust to California tax.  The California regulations specify that “the residence of a corporate fiduciary of a trust means the place where the corporation transacts the major portion of its administration of the trust.”  If the trust company or financial institution will conduct the majority of its trust administration within California then the trust income will be subject to California tax.

Jason Morris