Tag Archives: State Income Tax

‘Decant’ an Irrevocable Trust

Trust DecantIrrevocable may not mean what you think it means when it comes to trust planning.  Thanks to a process known as “trust decanting,” a trustee can change irrevocable trust terms. The decanting process occurs by figuratively pouring the trust assets from an old trust to a new trust agreement.  Just as one decants wine by pouring from an old bottle to a new one, a trustee can move trust assets to a new, more favorable trust. Nevada, along with 20 other states, has very favorable decanting laws in place.

There are limits as to what can be accomplished with decanting.  Trustees cannot alter a beneficiary’s already-vested interests in a trust.  However, a trustee can push back the age at which the beneficiary receives a payout.  Importantly, the trustee can change the governing law of the trust by moving the situs of the trust.  Nevada is the premier domestic self-settled spendthrift trust state so many trustees look to move their assets to Nevada.  In addition, if there is no successor trustee named, decanting can make it possible to name a proper successor trustee.

Nevada law is very favorable because there is no statutory requirement to notify beneficiaries of the decanting.  The trustee does not need to provide beneficiaries copies of the existing or new trust documents.  These privacy protections greatly favor the use of Nevada trust laws.  The trustee has discretion to seek court approval for the decanting process but is not required to do so.  In reality, the vast majority of trustees seek beneficiary approval before starting the procedure to decant the trust assets.

There are uncertain implications for gift, income, and generation-skipping transfers taxes. The Internal Revenue Service has not issued guidelines related to the federal tax issues presented by decanting.  However, the IRS has solicited comments for several years now and guidance should be forthcoming.  Even without federal income tax guidance, there are state income tax savings to be achieved by moving trust assets to a state like Nevada without income tax.

Open Shop in Reno, Save Taxes

ImageThe New York Times recently reported on Apple’s tax strategy which involves funneling profits through a Nevada corporation with offices in Reno, Nevada.  Apple has wisely taken advantage of Nevada’s non-existent corporate tax. In addition, Nevada does not have a corporate capital gains tax. While the tech giant is based out of Cupertino, California, Apple maintains a Reno office to collect and invest profits from its worldwide sales of iPods, iPhones, iPads, etc.

Estimates peg Apple’s current fiscal year profits at $46 billion, expected to be a record for an American business.  By largely avoiding California’s corporate tax rate of 8.84 percent, the tax savings are substantial.  Apple is not alone in seeking refuge in Nevada from the onerous California tax rates.  Microsoft operates a revenue recording center in Reno, Nevada to avoid the state of Washington’s royalty tax.

Not only does Nevada have low, or non-existent corporate tax rates, but also Nevada’s corporate laws are second-to-none.  Just a few of the protections afforded to Nevada entities are featured here.  If Apple and Microsoft embrace doing business in Nevada, should others consider following their lead?