Tag Archives: Nevada

“Inception” Lacks a Trust

In the recent Hollywood hit movie, Inception, Leonardo DiCaprio plays a corporate espionage thief who extracts information from subjects while they are dreaming. DiCaprio and his crew of thieves are hired to plant an idea in the mind of an heir to the world’s most powerful energy company. The spies seek to coax the heir into believing his father wants him to break-up the father’s vast energy empire. The flaw in Inception is that the dying patriarch of the energy giant sets forth his wishes in a last will and testament. The average business owner or an energy titan owner would not hold business interests outside of a trust or set forth his dispositive wishes in a will.

A trust serves many valuable functions; it is not just for business owners (or, the wealthy). A few reasons why you should consider putting your assets in a trust:

  • Provide Financial Management of your Property – You may act as trustee at first and later decide you no longer wish to do so. A trustee or successor trustee you’ve selected can take over the day-to-day property management.
  • Provide Property Management if you can’t manage your affairs – If you become too ill or disabled to manage your property, your trustee or successor trustee will do this for you. With no trust in place, you would need a guardianship (or, conservatorship outside of Nevada). You can avoid the trouble and expense of setting up such arrangements if you have a living trust.
  • Avoid Probate – Property in your revocable living trust doesn’t go through probate after your death. However, if you fail to title property in the name of the trust, those assets will have to pass through probate.
  • Quick Distribution to Beneficiaries – This is another advantage of avoiding probate. The probate process delays property distribution. With a trust, your trustee can distribute property to your beneficiaries sooner.

A trust does not eliminate the need for a will. You may have property that never gets transferred to your trust. A will can act as a backstop to transfer any property to your trust. However, if you happen to own the world’s largest energy company, you should definitely have a trust.

by: Jason Morris, Esq.

Will I Be Disinherited If I Challenge the Will?

Most wills and trusts contain a provision that says something like this: “If any beneficiary hereunder shall attack this last will and testament, such beneficiary’s share shall be thereby revoked and such beneficiary shall receive nothing” or “If anyone shall challenge this document, I leave such person $1.00.” This type of clause is known as a “no contest” or “in terrorem” clause; the latter is Latin meaning to frighten someone. In other words, the person making the will or trust includes this clause in order to scare beneficiaries or would-be beneficiaries from initiating a legal challenge or contest to the will or trust.

Are no contest clauses actually enforceable? In Nevada, they are enforceable, but with some significant caveats. First, no heir will be disinherited for asking a court to enforce the terms of the will, or enforcing that person’s legal rights under the will or trust. Moreover, it is perfectly legitimate for an heir to petition the court for instructions with respect to how the will should be interpreted. Second, regardless of the no contest clause, an heir who, in good faith, has probable cause to believe that the will was invalid, may bring an action challenging the will without fear of being disinherited, provided that he or she meets the standards set forth in Nevada’s probate code.

Does this defeat the intention of the person who made the will? Hopefully not. No contest clauses are designed to threaten family members who got less than their “fair” share—for example, where someone is intentionally omitted or got less than his brothers or sisters. The trouble is that if no one could legally challenge a will without being disinherited, then many families would be out of luck in situations involving undue influence. For example, a caretaker or perhaps a girlfriend or recently acquired spouse may unduly influence a sick or dying person, swaying or even coercing the susceptible testator to execute a will leaving nothing to family members. Nevada’s law on no contest clauses is intended to balance the interests of those who are of sound mind and memory and want to give uneven shares to their family members with the interests of those who are sick and susceptible to undue influence when they execute their wills.

If you have questions, you should contact a qualified Nevada probate attorney.

By Sharon M. Parker, Esq.

Online Estate Planning

Today, I can roll out of bed and with a few clicks on my phone, transfer money from my checking account to my online savings account, purchase a song on iTunes, and make a payment on my power bill. Years ago, each of these discrete activities would have required separate trips to various businesses. At the very least, each activity could not be accomplished online.

The shift to a virtual world directly affects our everyday lives and what occurs at our death. With the explosion of social media and increasingly more powerful smartphones, the significance of our online presence is not limited to financial accounts. Social media giants like Twitter and Facebook have adopted deceased user policies. Prior to the Virginia Tech massacre in 2007, Facebook automatically closed down user profiles after death. Students, families, and friends objected to this policy because they wanted to leave tributes and messages on the shooting victims’ profiles. Now, following notice of a deceased user, Facebook allows profiles to be “memorialized,” or changed into tribute pages without certain personal information.

Heirs may want to maintain sites or blogs with special sentimental value such as photo sharing sites like Kodak Gallery, Shutterfly, and Flickr. Many blog creators and Twitter users have hundreds if not thousands of followers. With all of the time and effort expended in creating and posting interesting content, the users would not likely want their online presence to vanish immediately upon their passing.

Can a surviving spouse access any of the online accounts mentioned above? For years, consumer advocates warned of the pitfalls of keeping a written list of our passwords. Create strong passwords with numbers, letters, symbols, and capitalized letters! Do not share your passwords with anyone! However, this caution-filled advice can create problems at death. I confronted this dilemma recently when a client sought to bequeath his online gaming account to a designated beneficiary. The client determined it was best if our office kept the login information rather than give the information to the designated trustee. The client confessed that he did not want the trustee to see how much he had expended (lost) on the hobby. For good reason, many of us would not want our loved ones to access our email and other online accounts.

Therein lies the dilemma. Several companies offer a potential solution. Three main competitors, AssetLock.net, Legacy Locker, and Deathswitch.com, are online services that allow users the ability to pass on their online assets. The companies give account access to various designated beneficiaries by giving the beneficiaries your passwords and can send final messages to friends. The online companies charge yearly or lifetime fees to act as your digital personal representatives. The conundrum is that these services will require human “verifiers” that the account holder is deceased and the online assets should be distributed.

The procedure for obtaining online account access can be even more burdensome if someone is incapacitated. If the incapacitated person has not executed a power of attorney, his or her spouse or family will need a guardian or conservator appointed. This may not suffice as certain financial institutions will require a court order customized to the particular account. All of these predicaments beg the question: What to do?

Individuals could give a lawyer or dependable relative all of the online account information. If you are fortunate to have several trustworthy loved ones, you could split up your accounts among a group of different people. The tried-and-true approach of leaving vital, important documents in a home safe or safety-deposit box could work well too. However, ensure that someone can access the safe or deposit box. At the very least, you should maintain a list of your online accounts and the domain names and inform someone where the list is.

Even if you have permission to use a spouse or family member’s online accounts during life, legally you may not be able to access their accounts after death. Notify the service provider so that others do not prey upon the account. Such notification will stop online bill pay services and other automated transactions. For those collecting Social Security benefits, loved ones must return any payments received after a recipient passes away. Benefits are often paid through direct deposit which should be stopped by notifying the bank and the Social Security Administration of the recipient’s death.

The law is sluggish in maintaining pace with the rapid evolution of online services. Clients and their counsel must be aware of the looming issues before losing Face(book) and turning to Google for solutions. If you have questions or concerns, you should contact an estate planning attorney.

This article appears in the December 13 edition of Northern Nevada Business Weekly.

Nevada Probate for Dummies®, Part One

“For a man may do his work with wisdom, knowledge and skill, and then he must leave all he owns to someone who has not worked for it. This too is meaningless and a great misfortune.” –Ecclesiastes 2:21

What happens to your belongings when you die? In Nevada, the answer largely depends on what preparation and planning you do while you are alive. It also depends on the size of your estate. For those who do not create a trust during their lifetime, or for those who do not put all their property into their trust, a court may oversee the process of transferring assets from the deceased to those who are entitled to inherit.

Nevada has four levels of probate or estate administration.

  1. Affidavit. If the deceased owned $25,000 or less, had no real property and no debts, the heirs can present a simple affidavit with a death certificate to a bank, DMV or the like in order to transfer title. In this case there is no need to file anything in court.  A surviving spouse may use the Affidavit for an estate with a gross value of less than $100,000.
  2. Set Aside. If the deceased owned $100,000 or less, the heirs can petition the district court to set aside the estate to the heirs or beneficiaries without any court supervised administration. This procedure is relatively simple and economical.
  3. Summary Administration. If the deceased owned between $100,000.01 and $300,000, the will must be lodged with the court and the person designated the personal representative or executor must conduct a formal, court supervised procedure to administer the estate, pay the debts and distribute the remaining assets to the heirs. If the deceased did not have a will, a relative or other interested person may petition to administer the estate. The assets would go to the relatives of the deceased in accordance with Nevada’s laws of intestate succession.
  4. General Administration. If the deceased owned more than $300,000, the estate must be administered under court supervision, as in a summary administration. The only difference between the two is that in a general administration, there is a longer period of time in which creditors have to file claims against the estate.

Sharon Parker

FOR DUMMIES® is a registered trademark of Wiley Publishing, Inc.

Nevada Living Will Lockbox

The Nevada Secretary of State (“SOS”) has created a website for Nevadans to confidentially upload and store their medical directives and powers of attorney.  The website, livingwilllockbox.com, can be accessed through the SOS website.  By storing your advance directive in the lockbox you and your health care providers may retrieve a copy of the advance directive during an emergency or illness.

The lockbox will retain declarations concerning life-saving treatment (NRS 449.535-690), durable powers of attorney for health care decisions (NRS 449.800-860), and do-not-resuscitate orders (NRS 450B.420).  This service is free.  The registrant must fill out a Registration Agreement, which is a basic two-page form, and provide a copy of the advance directive to the SOS office.  Agents, including attorneys, may fill out the registration form on behalf of the registrant.  The agents must state that they are authorized to act on behalf of the registrant.

After receipt of the advance directive, the SOS will send a wallet card with a registration number to be used by the registrant or agent to access the documents.  In order to access the documents, there is a webpage which asks for the registration number.  The website urges registrants to provide their directive(s) to their family, friends (if named as agents) and health care providers.  By sharing this information with trusted associates you can be assured that your wishes will be honored.  The SOS reminds registrants not to provide Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, or other identifying information on any of the registration material.

Jason Morris