Tag Archives: Nevada

Open Shop in Reno, Save Taxes

ImageThe New York Times recently reported on Apple’s tax strategy which involves funneling profits through a Nevada corporation with offices in Reno, Nevada.  Apple has wisely taken advantage of Nevada’s non-existent corporate tax. In addition, Nevada does not have a corporate capital gains tax. While the tech giant is based out of Cupertino, California, Apple maintains a Reno office to collect and invest profits from its worldwide sales of iPods, iPhones, iPads, etc.

Estimates peg Apple’s current fiscal year profits at $46 billion, expected to be a record for an American business.  By largely avoiding California’s corporate tax rate of 8.84 percent, the tax savings are substantial.  Apple is not alone in seeking refuge in Nevada from the onerous California tax rates.  Microsoft operates a revenue recording center in Reno, Nevada to avoid the state of Washington’s royalty tax.

Not only does Nevada have low, or non-existent corporate tax rates, but also Nevada’s corporate laws are second-to-none.  Just a few of the protections afforded to Nevada entities are featured here.  If Apple and Microsoft embrace doing business in Nevada, should others consider following their lead?

Nevada is Premier Self-Settled Spendthrift Trust State

On June 4, 2011, Governor Sandoval signed Senate Bill 221 which strengthened Nevada’s already outstanding self-settled spendthrift trust laws.  The most beneficial aspect of the new legislation relates to changing the situs of existing asset protection trusts to Nevada without restarting the statute of limitations period.  Nevada has two primary advantages over the other 13 states which permit self-settled, spendthrift trusts.  First, Nevada is the only state without a statutory exception allowing creditors to pierce the trust.   Second, Nevada has the shortest statute of limitations period to protect a transfer to the trust.

The new legislation makes the following changes effective October 1, 2011:

1. More Trust Types (CRT, QPRT, GRAT) Qualify

The new bill specifically allows charitable remainder trusts, qualified personal residence trusts, and grantor retained annuity trust to qualify under the statute.  Also, the bill allows the settlor to use real or personal property owned by the trust without limiting the scope of the protection provided by the spendthrift trust.

2. Tacking of Statute of Limitations Period for Trusts Migrating to Nevada

This new provision allows settlors who have established asset protection trusts in other states with less favorable laws to change the situs to Nevada without restarting the statute of limitations.

3. Limited Trustee Liability

Nevada law already protects an advisor to the settlor or trustee of a spendthrift trust from claims unless the claimant can prove by clear and convincing evidence that the advisor knowingly and in bad faith violated Nevada law, and that his actions directly caused damage to the claimant. The new legislation now also protects the trustee of a spendthrift trust unless the claimant can make the same showing as to the trustee.

4.  “Last in, First out”

The bill clarifies that later transfers in trust are disregarded for purposes of determining whether a creditor may bring an action with respect to an earlier transfer to the trust.  The new language makes clear that a more recent
transfer for which the statute of limitations period has not run will not spoil
the whole trust.

5.  Decanting Spendthrift Trusts

Now, the trustee of a self-settled spendthrift trust may decant the trust into another spendthrift trust without affecting the statute of limitations period applicable to the assets in the original trust. The date the property was initially transferred to the original spendthrift trust will be the deemed transfer date for the property even after it has been decanted into the second spendthrift trust.

6. Limitation of Actions Against Spendthrift Trust

This provision clarifies that no action of any kind may be brought at law or in equity against the trustee of a spendthrift trust if at the date the action is brought an action by a creditor with respect to a transfer to the spendthrift trust would be barred.  Prior to this, questions arose whether Nevada’s four year statute of limitations for fraudulent transfers applied in lieu of the two year statute of limitations period for spendthrift trusts. In addition, a creditor may not bring an action with respect to a transfer of property to a spendthrift trust unless the creditor can prove by clear and convincing evidence that the transfer (i) was a fraudulent transfer or (ii) “violates a legal obligation owed to the creditor under a contract or a valid court order that is legally enforceable by that creditor.”

7.  Unauthorized Agreements by Trustee are Void

SB 221 clarifies that the settlor only has rights and powers conferred specifically in the instrument, and any agreement between the settlor and trustee attempting to grant or expand those rights is void. This provision solidifies the use of the NV self-settled spendthrift trust as a completed gift trust, which will bolster its use as an estate tax avoidance method.

You can contact an experienced Nevada estate planning attorney at 775-688-3000.

Don L. Ross Recognized as Legal Elite

Don L. Ross and John P. Fowler were named as two of the Top 35 attorneys in Northern Nevada by Nevada Business Magazine. The 2011 Legal Elite list represents the top attorneys in Nevada. Nevada has 10,584 licensed attorneys and of those, this year’s 135 (between Southern and Northern Nevada) represent the top one percent. These attorneys have received one of the highest endorsements possible; a recommendation from other lawyers in Nevada.

Congratulations to Don and John for their well-deserved honor!

How Do You Hold Title to Your Assets?

How you hold title to an asset affects how it can be disposed of during lifetime and how it will be distributed upon your death. Title to property affects inheritance taxes and the extent to which probate may be needed.

Community Property. Nevada is a community property state. Property acquired during marriage by the labor of either or both spouses is deemed “community property” and each spouse has an equal interest therein.  It is possible to acquire or hold property as “community property” or as “community property with right of survivorship.” The additional language “with right of survivorship” ensures that the surviving spouse will receive title to the whole of the asset upon the death of the first spouse. Holding an asset as community property also creates a tax advantage, in that the surviving spouse will get a step up in basis on the asset to the date of death of the first spouse. In other words, the surviving spouse will not have to pay a capital gains tax on the increase in value from the date of purchase to the date of the first spouse’s death.

Separate Property. A married person may also hold property as his or her separate property. This includes property that was acquired prior to marriage, or property acquired during marriage by one spouse only as a gift or an inheritance. A spouse with separate property may make a gift of that property to the community by deeding or changing title of the asset to community property. If the spouse continues to hold the property as separate, upon death the spouse may will it to anyone he wishes; the surviving spouse does not have any legal right to it. However, if a spouse with separate property dies without a will, separate property will pass according to Nevada’s laws on intestate succession, and the surviving spouse will be entitled to a share of the property.

Joint Tenancy. Two persons, whether or not married, may hold property as joint tenants. Upon the death of one joint tenant, the surviving joint tenant becomes the owner of the whole of the property. In other words, the heirs of the first joint tenant to die do not inherit that person’s interest in the property; it passes by operation of law to the surviving joint tenant. For this reason, sometimes joint tenancy language also says “with right of survivorship.” For married couples, a partial step-up in basis is available if title is held in joint tenancy.

Couples should be aware of and sensitive to the manner in which they hold title. A change in how an asset is titled will change how the asset is distributed at death. If you have questions or concerns, you should contact a qualified Nevada attorney.

By: Sharon M. Parker, Esq.

Divorce Forfeiture Provisions in a Will or Trust

A forfeiture provision may be drafted such that a couple must remain married in order for both spouses to receive distributions or withdrawals from the estate. Such a provision would not be invalid because the provision does not encourage divorce or disrupt the family relations. None of the Restatements of Law, which are legal treatises, prohibit forfeiture provisions upon divorce. In fact, some states allow reasonable restrictions upon remarriage of a surviving spouse.

Certain provisions in a will or trust may be held invalid on the basis that they would disrupt family relations. For example, a provision which provides for the payment of money to a beneficiary if he divorces or separates from a spouse may be invalid. Similarly, a provision which prohibits distributions to a beneficiary if he does not divorce or separate from a spouse may be invalid. Also, a provision cannot deny a bequest until a beneficiary’s spouse dies or the beneficiary divorces his spouse. Likewise, a trust or will provision must not prohibit marriage altogether or severely limit a beneficiary’s choice of spouse.

A dispositive instrument, will or trust, may provide for a beneficiary in the event of a divorce or death. A special disposition to an unmarried beneficiary may be available to relieve pressure upon the beneficiary to remain in or enter a marriage. Wills and trusts can be custom drafted to fit many varied situations. Whenever possible, the construction of a trust instrument will be favored that upholds the validity of the trust and renders the instrument effective.  Despite judicial inclination to uphold trusts, provisions violating public policy will be held invalid.