Category Archives: Trusts

Joe Paterno’s Will Reveals Little More Than Revocable Living Trust

Today, closing arguments are being held in the jury trial of accused sex offender Jerry Sandusky.  His former boss, legendary Penn State football coach Joe Paterno, has created intrigue in an unrelated legal matter.  Paterno’s family sought court protection to seal Paterno’s will from public disclosure. After a local newspaper filed a motion to unseal the will, Paterno’s family made public his 1997 will and 2010 codicil to the will.

ImageAfter reviewing the contents to the will and the codicil, there is nothing surprising or notable about their contents.  The family’s efforts to seal the testamentary documents seem unreasonable and misguided.  Typically, wills must be lodged with the county court or probate department before the decedent’s assets may be distributed.  Paterno’s will is a pour-over will meaning it directs any probate assets to be poured over to a revocable living trust.  Most likely, the Paterno revocable living trust specifies the distribution of Paterno’s assets.

A revocable living trust is advantageous because you do not need to lodge the trust with the court.  The administration of the trust and distribution of the estate can take place outside of public review and records.  In addition, with advances in medicine and technology, individuals are living beyond their ability to manage their financial affairs.  Revocable living trusts allow successor trustees to take over and manage the financial affairs of those suffering from diminished capacity.

Living trusts are only effective insofar as you title the assets properly.  Your assets should be titled in the name of the trust.  The Paterno will, a pour-over will, acts as a backstop in the event that an asset is not titled properly in the name of the trust.   Any asset that is not transferred into a living trust must pass through probate first prior to its distribution.  Oddly, the Paterno family has not filed a petition to initiate a probate of any assets.  The family efforts to seal the will and codicil appear unnecessary and unusual. As with the Sandusky trial, the Paterno will story may end this week. Or, future court proceedings may loom ahead.

“It’s Your Estate” Lecture Series

Several charities, including the Community Foundation of Western Nevada, are sponsoring a free workshop series titled, “It’s Your Estate.”  The workshops are designed to educate the public in the consumer financial arena and help them take charge of their own money and estate.  Jason C. Morris, Esq.will present on the Advanced Estate Planning topic this week of April 17th – 19th, 2012.  Mr. Morris will present at Northwest Reno Library, 2325 Robb Drive, at 2:30 p.m. on April 17th.  On April 18th, Mr. Morris will present at the Spanish Springs Library, 7100 Pyramid Way #A, Sparks at 11:30 a.m. and offer another presentation at the South Valleys Library, 15650 Wedge Parkway, Reno at 2:30 p.m.  On April 19th, Mr. Morris will present at the Sparks Library, 1125 12th Street, at 11:30 a.m.

Choose Lawyers Instead of Internet or Software Programs

The following article appeared in the April 2nd, 2012 edition of Northern Nevada Business Weekly:

The Internet has altered numerous industries including the legal market. Despite the many advantages of online services, there are considerable drawbacks when comparing the use of Web-based legal services versus hiring a competent attorney. Budding entrepreneurs and successful business owners may look to online service providers as a low-cost alternative to hiring an attorney. There is no refuting that the online document providers offer very low advertised prices. Yet, the use of an Internet legal provider may be a shortsighted and potentially very costly long-term choice. It seems that each day the online legal providers increase their advertising and thereby heighten the expectations surrounding their products and services. The online providers promise to create effective legal entities, whether limited liability companies or corporations. Similarly, the Internet-based companies claim to produce valid estate planning documents, contracts and other legal agreements.

Recently, our office has seen several clients suffer from reliance upon documents produced by Internet legal providers. Some attorneys quip that these online offerings are a roundabout boon for business. How is this so? The computer-created documents rarely achieve the users’ intended goals. Attorneys regularly profit from correcting mistakes in poorly-drafted documents originating from online legal providers. Belatedly, program users seek attorneys to redeem the improper documentation. As with most technology, the quality of the output matches the quality of the input.

A common claim among all of these online companies is that their documents are “accepted by courts in all 50 states.” The mere “acceptance” by a court should not persuade you. Courts routinely accept handwritten documents, whether contracts, pleadings, or wills. The threshold for having a document accepted into court is extremely low. More importantly, the goal for most practical business people is to avoid court at all costs. So, the most widely-used claim the online legal providers use to bolster their offerings is counterproductive to users’ ultimate objective.

Moreover, the online companies’ “acceptance” claim may be untrue. Our office has encountered several documents which do not meet the statutory requirements under Nevada law. For example, Nevada has a self-proving affidavit for wills. We have seen several of the supposed self-proving affidavits generated by software programs which do not comply with Nevada requirements. Without the proper affidavit form, you (and most likely an attorney) must track down the original witnesses to the will to get statements verifying what they witnessed.

Prospective users should be aware that these legal providers do not adequately represent their offerings. Many claim to be “self-help” centers. Yet, a company providing legal documents and recommendations to individuals is providing legal services. The online companies may try to couch their product in a creative fashion to avoid accusations that the online providers engage in the unauthorized practice of law. You must see through their mirage and recognize what these online companies truly provide — legal help. As a consumer, you must understand that the legal help offered is generalized, vague, and even misplaced. Consumer Reports recently tested three software and Internet products designed to assist in estate planning. Consumer Reports warned that “among the problems we found in one or more of these products: outdated information, insufficient customization, incompleteness, inability to handle some tax issues, and lack of flexibility.” One benefit of the online planning packages is for educating yourself regarding the choices to be made. The planning process can be assisted as couples consider who should fill the various roles in an estate planning package such as guardians for minor children. Yet, these same choices can and will be discussed with your real, live attorney.

Online service providers will not assure that a matter is completed to its conclusion. In creating business entities, such as S-corporations or LLCs, we have seen serious holes in the packages provided by online or software programs. Recently, I have seen corporations created without bylaws and LLCs lacking operating agreements. Regularly, we encounter entities lacking corporate minutes. The absence of these foundational documents leaves business entities without a rulebook and the business owners exposed to personal liability. If you have a corporation or LLC and do not possess bylaws or operating agreement and fail to maintain minutes, you should feel troubled. The online service providers are adept at providing an impressive stack of papers, albeit the vast majority will be blank and require further action. What is the sense in receiving a half-baked product?

In the estate planning context, a common issue arises with online service providers because they offer little, if any, assistance in funding a revocable living trust. If a trust is not funded, or, the assets are not titled in the name of the trust, the trust is ineffective. The primary purpose of creating a revocable living trust is probate avoidance. If the trust is not properly funded, a probate will be required. Attorneys assist clients in re-titling assets into the name of the trust and assuring that probate will be avoided. Online providers plug you into standard provisions, or “one size fits all” documents. These providers do not tailor estate planning documents, contracts, agreements or entities to meet your specific legal needs. There are no longer generalists in the law. Attorneys spend years developing expertise in given fields of law. Firms possess experts in various areas of the law. Real attorneys can assist with tangential issues more readily. If you are serious about planning for your business, entering a legal agreement or planning your estate, I urge you to contact a reputable attorney. Or, you may choose the temporary, low-cost alternative, but please remember the age-old maxim “you get what you pay for.”

Jason C. Morris, Esq.

Facebook Billionaires Avoid Taxes with GRATs

Forbes recently highlighted how Facebook co-founders Mark Zuckerberg and Dustin Moskovitz established grantor retained annuity trusts (GRATs) to transfer significant amounts of wealth tax-free.  In 2008, Zuckerberg and Moskovitz established GRATs which will enable the Facebook executives to transfer as much as $185 million to future offspring or others without paying any gift tax.  Most wealthy individuals recognize that this year offers a golden opportunity to transfer $5.12 million in assets without incurring any gift tax. However, the Facebook executives followed a similar tax strategy to the Walmart founders, the Walton family, by funding their GRATs with their rapidly appreciating Facebook shares.

ImageGRATs function by allowing a grantor (Zuckerberg and Moskovitz) to place shares or other assets into an ­irrevocable trust and retain the right to ­receive an annual payment back from the trust for a period of time.  Typically, to avoid the risk of premature death, advisors select a shorter time period of 2 to 4 years. If the grantor survives that period, any property left in the trust when the annual payments end passes to family members, other beneficiaries, or another trust.

A crucial aspect is determining the value of the remainder interest in the annuity. In calculating how much value will be left at the end of the annuity term (the remainder) — and thus how big a gift the grantor is making — the IRS does look at the performance of the actual stock (or any other asset) in the trust. Instead, the IRS assumes the trust assets are earning a meager government-determined interest rate. With a zeroed-out, or “Walton” GRAT, the grantor receives an annuity that leaves nothing for heirs if assets grow only at the IRS’ lowly interest rate. If the assets grow faster, the excess goes to the heirs gift tax free. If assets or stock under-perform or decrease in value, there is no downside for the grantor because the annuity can be paid by returning some shares each year to the grantor.

As a result, a GRAT is an ideal instrument to shift assets you expect to suddenly increase in value.  Hence, rapidly appreciating stock of technology giants (Facebook) or growing retails empires (Walmart) have proven to be the perfect assets to utilize within a GRAT.  President Obama and Democrat legislators have targeted zeroed-out GRATs as tax loopholes of the wealthy and have proposed legislation which would eliminate their use.  Until that time, the GRAT remains a valuable wealth transfer tool.

Choose Lawyers Instead of the Internet

The Internet has changed numerous industries including the legal market.  Despite the many advantages of online services, there are considerable drawbacks when comparing the use of web-based estate planning forms versus hiring a competent attorney. The following list comes from a North Carolina attorney. Rather than relying on the bare information fed into a computer, a skilled lawyer can:

  1. Listen to your goals and desires and incorporate them into your plan.
  2. Offer advice, not just words on paper.
  3. Help with referrals to other trusted professionals.
  4. Make sure that the documents are properly executed.
  5. Make sure that any trusts are properly funded.
  6. Make sure that beneficiary designations are properly completed.
  7. Make sure that accounts and real estate are  properly titled.
  8. Help with managing assets of incapacitated family members.
  9. Help with probate and trust administration.
  10. Help with income, gift and estate tax matters.
  11. Help ensure governmental benefits for disabled or incapacitated family members.
  12. Serve as an advocate in dealing with financial institution and governmental bodies.
  13. Care about you and your family.

Of course, there is a sinister view that attorneys embrace computer-based estate planning programs because such planning generally leads to a much more costly probate proceeding.  To avoid the added cost and delay involved in a probate,  and enjoy the benefits listed above, consult with an estate planning specialist today.