Category Archives: Trusts

Careful with Deathbed Planning

As death looms, people become much more focused on arranging their affairs.  Even those with few assets will develop a laser-like focus on leaving a suitable legacy.  There are pitfalls to death-bed estate plans or revisions to existing plans.  In a perfect world, an estate plan is constructed carefully after much thought and revisions are made regularly.  However, lawyers and financial advisors are often solicited to make changes when a client fears an imminent demise.

Image

Recently, I helped clients update their revocable living trust after the wife was diagnosed with terminal cancer.  They created their trust 20 years ago and had not made any updates since that time.  In the intervening years, one of their five children had passed away and numerous grandchildren had been born.  The prior version of their trust provided that if one of their children predeceased them, the surviving children would receive the estate equally.  The clients instead wanted the trust share that would have passed to the deceased child to be held in trust for the deceased child’s children or the clients’ grandchildren.  If nothing had been done, the clients would have disinherited their grandchildren.

When making near-death amendments or creating new estate plans, advisors and clients must consider the income tax ramifications. A common mistake is to transfer a home or real property to children or grandchildren prior to death.  Such a transfer results in loss of the step-up in basis of the property to the date-of-death fair market value.  The child or grandchild receiving the property steps into the shoes of the transferring parent or grandparent and takes the transferor’s basis in the property.  Usually, the basis is much lower than the present day fair market value.  When the child or grandchild sells the property, he or she will incur a much higher capital gains tax than necessary.

Finally, to avoid a contest, a medical or mental competency examination can assure that the client is competent to make the change.  These exams can be administered by the client’s regular physician.  By using their normal physician, the client will feel more at ease and the physician will already have a history with the client and be able to differentiate whether the client lacks capacity.

Death-bed planning can be done effectively but there are numerous considerations and precautions to follow.

Updating Your Estate Planning after You Get Married

ImageMy husband and I were married this past May 25, so today we are celebrating our sixth mensiversary (or, perhaps our semi-anniversary?). Our marriage has truly been a great blessing for both of us—doubly so because we waited until later in life to find each other. As a probate and estate lawyer, I’d like to report that as soon as we got married, we set up a trust and put all our assets in it, so that we’re perfectly prepared for the day when death does us part. However…it seems that life is a bit messier and more complicated than that, even for lawyers in love. We’ve each taken the step of updating our wills, and many of our assets are now jointly owned; but truth be told, we have a way to go before we are done combining our assets.

How does marriage change your estate planning needs? I’ve had opportunity to reflect on this recently not only because of my own life, but also because of some of the cases I’ve worked on. In one case, a couple cohabited for several years before the man died. He left no will, so pursuant to intestate succession, his child will inherit his estate. However, the former girlfriend has made a claim against his estate, claiming that they held their property in a kind of quasi-community property agreement. Would it have made a difference if they’d been married?

Yes and no. Simply getting married doesn’t mean your property is jointly held or will go to your spouse upon your death. Nevada is a community property state, meaning that money earned or assets purchased during marriage are presumed to be community property in which each spouse has fifty percent interest. Upon death, the surviving spouse inherits the other half of the community property, unless the deceased spouse provides otherwise in his or her will. Property that you owned before marriage is separate property and remains so unless you make a gift of it to the community of your marriage. Your spouse may inherit a portion of your separate property, but a portion will go to your natural relatives (children from previous marriage, parents, siblings)—again, unless you provide otherwise by will. Things can get very complicated if your assets become mixed in character; for example, if you have a house partially paid off that you bring into the marriage, and you finish paying it off while married. The house is separate to the degree you paid for it before marriage and community property to the degree that your income during your marriage was used to pay the mortgage.

My husband and I have not been married previously and neither of us has any children. If we have no children together, we will need to make provision for how our assets will be distributed upon the death of the second spouse—it will need to go to charities we both agree on, or equally to our surviving relatives. In the case of people who have children from a previous marriage or relationship, things are more complicated. You need to provide for your children while taking into consideration the needs of your new spouse.

Don’t put off your estate planning—consider it an act of love for your family, who doesn’t want to be left with a mess. Contact Woodburn and Wedge for expert advice and assistance with estate planning, trust and probate matters.

Morris to Present Asset Protection Planning Seminar

Jason C. Morris, Esq. wJCM Profileill present a three-hour continuing legal education seminar on asset protection planning. The seminar, “Nevada: the Premier Asset Protection Jurisdiction,” will be held at the Bruce Thompson Federal Courthouse, 400 S. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89501 on Thursday, March 21, 2013 from 1:00 p.m. to 4:15 p.m.  The seminar is sponsored by the Washoe County Bar Association and qualifies for 3 hours of continuing legal education credit.

Nevada is Premier State for Domestic Asset Protection Trusts

Recently, a Probate and Property magazine article listed Nevada as the premier domestic jurisdiction for asset protection trusts.Locked Wallet  In the November/December 2012 issue, Barry Engel, founding principal of the Denver, Colorado firm of Engel & Raiman PC, was interviewed on “Asset Protection Developments.” Mr. Engel co-authored the 1989 amendment to the Cook Islands International Trust Act.  Mr. Engel complimented Nevada by stating:

In terms of domestic jurisdictions, we have used Nevada over the years more than any other state.  We like it for the protective legislation is has on the books, the quality of trustees available, its proactive attitude and approach toward domestic asset protection law, and how it seems to strive to make what it has even all the better.

Nevada continues to surpass other states in regard to its asset protection trusts and the protections available to debtors.  Our office can help you protect assets from creditors and assure your wealth preservation.

Carson City Recluse Leaves $7 Million Fortune in Gold

A Carson City man, Walter Samaszko, passed away in June with apparently no heirs and very little personal wealth.  However, cleaners preparing his house for sale discovered he held over $7 million in gold.  The Mercury News reports that a San Rafael, California woman appears to be the sole heir to the fortune. 

Mr. Samaszko, an anti-government champion, was dead for at least one month before neighbors discovered his corpse. Months later, the vast fortune was uncovered and includes stock accounts valued at over $165,000 and cash of $12,000.  The estimates of the $7 million estate are solely based on the weight of the gold.  However, there are rare, antique coins in the collection which could drive the total value far higher.

While this case is extremely unique for a number of reasons, there are lessons to be learned:

One, never assume the size or extent of anyone’s estate.  Despite appearances to the contrary, there are many wealthy individuals who show no signs of their wealth.

Two, plan now for incapacity and death.  There is no telling what Mr. Samaszko intended to do with his gold collection.  However, some simple estate planning could have assisted him in avoiding over $1 million in taxes.  Likely Mr. Samaszko would be abhorred to think that the government will be the beneficiary of his failure to plan.

Three, keep in contact with relatives, whether distant or remote.  You never know if you might end up becoming the lucky recipient of a gift or bequest from a family member.