Category Archives: Probate

Choose Lawyers Instead of Internet or Software Programs

The following article appeared in the April 2nd, 2012 edition of Northern Nevada Business Weekly:

The Internet has altered numerous industries including the legal market. Despite the many advantages of online services, there are considerable drawbacks when comparing the use of Web-based legal services versus hiring a competent attorney. Budding entrepreneurs and successful business owners may look to online service providers as a low-cost alternative to hiring an attorney. There is no refuting that the online document providers offer very low advertised prices. Yet, the use of an Internet legal provider may be a shortsighted and potentially very costly long-term choice. It seems that each day the online legal providers increase their advertising and thereby heighten the expectations surrounding their products and services. The online providers promise to create effective legal entities, whether limited liability companies or corporations. Similarly, the Internet-based companies claim to produce valid estate planning documents, contracts and other legal agreements.

Recently, our office has seen several clients suffer from reliance upon documents produced by Internet legal providers. Some attorneys quip that these online offerings are a roundabout boon for business. How is this so? The computer-created documents rarely achieve the users’ intended goals. Attorneys regularly profit from correcting mistakes in poorly-drafted documents originating from online legal providers. Belatedly, program users seek attorneys to redeem the improper documentation. As with most technology, the quality of the output matches the quality of the input.

A common claim among all of these online companies is that their documents are “accepted by courts in all 50 states.” The mere “acceptance” by a court should not persuade you. Courts routinely accept handwritten documents, whether contracts, pleadings, or wills. The threshold for having a document accepted into court is extremely low. More importantly, the goal for most practical business people is to avoid court at all costs. So, the most widely-used claim the online legal providers use to bolster their offerings is counterproductive to users’ ultimate objective.

Moreover, the online companies’ “acceptance” claim may be untrue. Our office has encountered several documents which do not meet the statutory requirements under Nevada law. For example, Nevada has a self-proving affidavit for wills. We have seen several of the supposed self-proving affidavits generated by software programs which do not comply with Nevada requirements. Without the proper affidavit form, you (and most likely an attorney) must track down the original witnesses to the will to get statements verifying what they witnessed.

Prospective users should be aware that these legal providers do not adequately represent their offerings. Many claim to be “self-help” centers. Yet, a company providing legal documents and recommendations to individuals is providing legal services. The online companies may try to couch their product in a creative fashion to avoid accusations that the online providers engage in the unauthorized practice of law. You must see through their mirage and recognize what these online companies truly provide — legal help. As a consumer, you must understand that the legal help offered is generalized, vague, and even misplaced. Consumer Reports recently tested three software and Internet products designed to assist in estate planning. Consumer Reports warned that “among the problems we found in one or more of these products: outdated information, insufficient customization, incompleteness, inability to handle some tax issues, and lack of flexibility.” One benefit of the online planning packages is for educating yourself regarding the choices to be made. The planning process can be assisted as couples consider who should fill the various roles in an estate planning package such as guardians for minor children. Yet, these same choices can and will be discussed with your real, live attorney.

Online service providers will not assure that a matter is completed to its conclusion. In creating business entities, such as S-corporations or LLCs, we have seen serious holes in the packages provided by online or software programs. Recently, I have seen corporations created without bylaws and LLCs lacking operating agreements. Regularly, we encounter entities lacking corporate minutes. The absence of these foundational documents leaves business entities without a rulebook and the business owners exposed to personal liability. If you have a corporation or LLC and do not possess bylaws or operating agreement and fail to maintain minutes, you should feel troubled. The online service providers are adept at providing an impressive stack of papers, albeit the vast majority will be blank and require further action. What is the sense in receiving a half-baked product?

In the estate planning context, a common issue arises with online service providers because they offer little, if any, assistance in funding a revocable living trust. If a trust is not funded, or, the assets are not titled in the name of the trust, the trust is ineffective. The primary purpose of creating a revocable living trust is probate avoidance. If the trust is not properly funded, a probate will be required. Attorneys assist clients in re-titling assets into the name of the trust and assuring that probate will be avoided. Online providers plug you into standard provisions, or “one size fits all” documents. These providers do not tailor estate planning documents, contracts, agreements or entities to meet your specific legal needs. There are no longer generalists in the law. Attorneys spend years developing expertise in given fields of law. Firms possess experts in various areas of the law. Real attorneys can assist with tangential issues more readily. If you are serious about planning for your business, entering a legal agreement or planning your estate, I urge you to contact a reputable attorney. Or, you may choose the temporary, low-cost alternative, but please remember the age-old maxim “you get what you pay for.”

Jason C. Morris, Esq.

“Et In Arcadia Ego…”

Our celebration of Thanksgiving is past and now the time of year is upon us in which most people busy themselves with preparations for Christmas. The “holiday season” is a busy and stressful time of year, and this is perhaps a factor in the higher number of deaths that occur this time of year. I sometimes wonder what would happen if people put as much time into planning for their passing as they put into Christmas preparations each year.

We see many different situations in our office. Some folks call about estate planning literally from their deathbeds. Some die before the documents are prepared; others sign everything in the nick of time. Many people think there will be plenty of time in the future to take care of estate planning. Some people are afraid that if they form a trust or execute a will, it means they will die—so they put it off.

The reality is that we will all die, ready or not. It makes a lot more sense to have an estate plan in place so that the administration and distribution of your possessions will be orderly upon your death. It is especially critical if you wish to leave anything to charity, or in unequal shares to your children, or the like. Also, for those who do not have relatives in Nevada, it is important to designate who will act as executor or personal representative; non-residents are not qualified unless they are designated in a will, or associate with a resident.

If you have been procrastinating your estate planning, or updating your estate planning, I encourage you to make an appointment with a qualified estate-planning attorney.

By: Sharon M. Parker, Esq.

Steve Jobs’ Billions Will Pass Pursuant to Trusts

Not long after Apple co-founder and innovator Steve Jobs passed away, folks speculated how his fortune would pass.  Admirably, and because he could, Jobs took a $1 salary in 2010 from Apple.  However, his wealth is estimated to be $7 billion.  Jobs held a large stake in the Walt Disney Co.  In 2006, it was estimated that he received $242 million in dividends before taxes from his Disney stock.  (Remember the part “because he could”) http://goo.gl/V7SuZ

Notably, land records in Silicon Valley reveal that Jobs and his wife transferred several real property parcels into trusts in 2009.  http://goo.gl/2HG0I  The virtue of revocable living trusts is that families are protected by privacy.  Using a will to pass real property means that the assets must go through probate court.  Properly funding a trust before death means the estate and assets remain out of the public eye. Also, jointly-owned property and assets with beneficiary designations (life insurance, 401K’s) pass outside of the probate process.

Proper planning and the strategic use of trusts is also vital for potentially difficult family dynamics.  Jobs had a child out of wedlock with his high school sweetheart.  A child is not automatically entitled to a share of a parent’s estate.  So whether Jobs chose to provide for his children, and how much, will likely remain out of the public eye assuming he had the proper planning in place.  Failing to state one’s intent with regard to planning will lead to inevitable family fighting.

While you might not be able to take a $1 salary, you can take action to ensure your planning wishes are carried out.  Contact a qualified estate planning attorney at 775-688-3000.

Estate Planning Awareness Week

October 17-23, 2011 has been designated by Congress as National Estate Planning Awareness Week.  Some estimate that as many as 120 million Americans do not have up-to-date estate plans and long term financial strategies to protect themselves or their families in the event of sickness, accidents, or untimely death.  The purpose of National Estate Planning Awareness Week is to encourage consumers to address these issues before they have a chance to negatively impact their daily lives.   Estate planning can include many different areas such as: retirement planning, asset protection planning, beneficiary designations, tax planning, planning for children, taking precautions to  address the risk of future disability, insurance planning, and more.

Locally, several charities are sponsoring a free workshop series titled, “It’s Your Estate.”  The workshops are designed to educate the public in the consumer financial arena and help them take charge of their own money and estate.  Jason C. Morris, Esq.will present on the Advanced Estate Planning topic the week of October 11th – 13th.  Mr. Morris will present at S. Valleys Library, 15650 Wedge Parkway, on October 11 at 2 p.m.  On October 12th, Mr. Morris will present at the North Valley Library, 1075 N. Hills Blvd #340 at 2 p.m.  Thursday, October 13th, Mr. Morris will present at the Sparks Library, 1125 12th Street, at 11:00 a.m. and offer another presentation at the Northwest Reno Library, 2325 Robb Drive, at 2:30 p.m.

For reservations or questions, call the Community Foundation of Western Nevada at 775.333.5499.

Executors Must Make Portability Election for 2011 Estates

The Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 added a new “portability feature” for estates of decedents dying after 2010 and before 2013, under which the applicable exclusion amount is the sum of (1) the “basic exclusion amount” (i.e., $5 million with an adjustment for inflation after 2011), and (2) in the case of a surviving spouse, the “deceased spousal unused exclusion amount.”  The “deceased spousal unused exclusion amount” is the lesser of: the basic exclusion amount, or the excess of the basic exclusion amount of the last deceased spouse dying after Dec. 31, 2010, of the surviving spouse, over the amount on which the tentative tax on the estate of the deceased spouse is determined.

A surviving spouse may use the deceased spousal unused exclusion amount in addition to her own $5 million exclusion for taxable transfers during life or at death.

The IRS recently issued a Notice reminding executors of estates of individuals dying after Dec. 31, 2010, that they must timely file a Form 706 tax return, in order to allow the surviving spouse to take advantage of the decedent’s unused exclusion amount.  Any attempts to make a portability election for the estate of a decedent dying on or before Dec. 31, 2010 will be ineffective.

Most married couples will want the surviving spouse to be able to take advantage of the unused basis exclusion amount of the first spouse to die.  In order to do so, a Form 706 must be properly and timely filed.  Form 706 must be filed in order to make the election, even if the estate is not required to file a Form 706 due to a value lower than the exclusion amount.

You can contact a qualified estate planning attorney at 775-688-3000 to discuss how you may take advantage of the portability election.

by: Jason Morris, Esq.