Author Archives: Jason C. Morris, Esq.

Caughlin Fire Reminds of Deductions from Losses

The following article appeared in the December 19th edition of Northern Nevada Business Weekly, available here http://goo.gl/ktL1v:

View of Downtown RenoOn Nov. 18, thousands of homes, offices and properties were threatened by a fire originating near Caughlin Ranch in Reno. The unusually dry autumn weather coupled with very strong winds created conditions which could have resulted in catastrophic losses. Although several homes were lost, the coordinated, diligent response by local fire protection agencies kept the losses from being far greater than they otherwise could have been. Despite the wonderful efforts of many community members to protect and preserve one another’s property, wrongdoers sought to prey on those affected by the fire. Just days after the fire, burglars targeted homes and vehicles in the disturbed neighborhoods. Officials warned residents to verify the credentials of those offering assistance. Scammers can cause additional harm by posing as insurance adjusters, carpet cleaners or contractors. Based on the recent events, taxpayers should be mindful of helpful tax deductions arising from casualty, disaster and theft losses. A casualty is the damage, destruction, or loss of property resulting from an identifiable event that is sudden, unexpected, or unusual. Deductible casualty losses can result from a number of different causes, including fires, floods, storms, and vandalism.

A theft is the illegal taking of another’s property. Theft includes the taking of money or property by burglary, larceny, looting, fraud and robbery.

To deduct a casualty or theft loss, the taxpayer must show that there was a casualty or theft and must support the amount taken as a deduction. Specifically, for a casualty loss the following must be established: 1. The type of casualty (fire, storm, etc.) and the date it occurred; 2. The loss directly resulted from the casualty; 3. The taxpayer owned the property, or leased and was contractually liable for the damage; and 4. Whether the taxpayer has a reasonable expectation of recovery on a claim for reimbursement.

For a theft loss, the taxpayer must establish the following: 1. Date it was discovered that the property was missing; 2. The property was stolen; 3. The taxpayer owned the property; 4. Whether the taxpayer had a reasonable expectation of recovery on a claim for reimbursement.

To determine the allowable deduction for a casualty or theft loss: 1. Determine the adjusted basis in the property before the casualty or theft. 2. Determine the decrease in fair market value of the property as a result of the casualty or theft. 3. Take the smaller of the amounts determined in the first two steps, and subtract any insurance or other reimbursement received or to be received.

For business or income-producing property, such as rental property, which is stolen or completely destroyed, the decrease in fair market value is not considered. The allowable loss equals the adjusted basis in the property, less any salvage value, less any insurance or other reimbursement received.

There are two ways to deduct a casualty or theft loss of inventory, including items held for sale to customers. One way is to simply deduct the loss through the increase in the cost of goods sold by properly reporting the opening and closing inventories. The loss cannot again be claimed as a casualty or theft loss. If this approach is followed, the taxpayer must include in gross income any insurance or other reimbursement received.

The other way is to deduct the casualty or theft loss separately. If deducted separately, the affected inventory items must be eliminated from the cost of goods sold by making a downward adjustment to opening inventory or purchases. The loss must be reduced by any reimbursement received. Do not include the reimbursement in gross income. If the reimbursement is not received by the end of the year, the loss must still be reduced by the amount of reimbursement for which there is a reasonable expectation of recovery.

If the taxpayer is liable for casualty damage to leased property, the loss is the cost to repair the property less any insurance or other reimbursement.

If insurance or other type of reimbursement is received, the loss is reduced to the extent of the reimbursement. A claim for insurance reimbursement must be filed in a timely fashion or the casualty or theft loss may be lost.

After the loss amount is determined, the taxpayer must next determine how much of the loss is deductible. The deduction for casualty and theft losses of employee property and personal-use property is limited. A loss on employee property is subject to the 2 percent rule. Employee property is property used in performing services as an employee. The casualty and theft loss deduction for employee property, when added to other miscellaneous itemized deductions, must be reduced by 2 percent of adjusted gross income.

A loss on personal use property is subject to the $100 and 10 percent rules. After determining the casualty or theft loss on personal-use property, the loss is reduced by $100. The total of all casualty or theft losses on personal-use property is reduced by 10 percent of the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income. Losses on business property (other than employee property) and income-producing property are not subject to the 2 percent and 10 percent rules.

However, if the casualty or theft loss involved a home used for business or as a rental, the deductible loss may be limited. The casualty or theft loss deductions must be figured separately for property used for both personal and business or income-producing purposes. The taxpayer must allocate the total cost or basis, the fair market value before and after the casualty or theft loss, and the insurance or other reimbursement between the business and personal use of the property. Just as property owners should seek qualified professionals in making repairs or improvements to damaged property, those looking to claim casualty and theft loss deductions should consult with a professional tax advisor.

By: Jason C. Morris, Esq. and Don L. Ross, Esq.

Proceed With Caution on Inherited IRA’s

Parents and grandparents who saved and invested in retirement accounts should take special care to make sure their children and grandchildren receive the most benefit from their inheritance.  A recent Wall Street Journal article highlighted some of the complex rules surrounding the inheritance of IRAs.  http://goo.gl/tilfc. 

Client regularly ask whether they should liquidate an IRA.   Rather than taking a lump sum distribution, and paying the accompanying taxes, clients will often derive the most tax-efficient results by transferring the assets into an inherited IRA.  An inherited IRA allows a young beneficiary to spread distributions across his or her longer life expectancy.  Simply taking small, annual distributions can allow the IRA to grow while minimizing the tax burden borne by the recipient of the inherited account.

Individuals should be wary of receiving any funds in their name. Clients looking to move the account from one brokerage account to another should do a direct “trustee to trustee” exchange.  Otherwise, the IRS deems the transfer as a total distribution which is subject to tax.

As with most financial planning decisions, you should consult with tax and investment professionals before jeopardizing potential tax advantages.

Prime Time for Planning

As we have previously posted here and here, this is a golden age for transferring wealth.  The combination of depressed asset values, historically low interest rates, and hefty gift tax exemption make this the ideal time to distribute wealth to lower generations.

This recent Wall Street Journal article lists several strategies to take advantage of this opportune time to transfer wealth:  http://goo.gl/jGUqq.  As we noted in our post back in February, GRATs and valuation discounts are your allies in transferring wealth.  Both of these techniques have been examined by Congress as tax “loopholes ” that may be closed in the future.  As always, the message remains to act now while the tax laws and current economic climate are unusually favorable. We can only be sure that this offer lasts through 2012.

Steve Jobs’ Billions Will Pass Pursuant to Trusts

Not long after Apple co-founder and innovator Steve Jobs passed away, folks speculated how his fortune would pass.  Admirably, and because he could, Jobs took a $1 salary in 2010 from Apple.  However, his wealth is estimated to be $7 billion.  Jobs held a large stake in the Walt Disney Co.  In 2006, it was estimated that he received $242 million in dividends before taxes from his Disney stock.  (Remember the part “because he could”) http://goo.gl/V7SuZ

Notably, land records in Silicon Valley reveal that Jobs and his wife transferred several real property parcels into trusts in 2009.  http://goo.gl/2HG0I  The virtue of revocable living trusts is that families are protected by privacy.  Using a will to pass real property means that the assets must go through probate court.  Properly funding a trust before death means the estate and assets remain out of the public eye. Also, jointly-owned property and assets with beneficiary designations (life insurance, 401K’s) pass outside of the probate process.

Proper planning and the strategic use of trusts is also vital for potentially difficult family dynamics.  Jobs had a child out of wedlock with his high school sweetheart.  A child is not automatically entitled to a share of a parent’s estate.  So whether Jobs chose to provide for his children, and how much, will likely remain out of the public eye assuming he had the proper planning in place.  Failing to state one’s intent with regard to planning will lead to inevitable family fighting.

While you might not be able to take a $1 salary, you can take action to ensure your planning wishes are carried out.  Contact a qualified estate planning attorney at 775-688-3000.

Estate Planning Awareness Week

October 17-23, 2011 has been designated by Congress as National Estate Planning Awareness Week.  Some estimate that as many as 120 million Americans do not have up-to-date estate plans and long term financial strategies to protect themselves or their families in the event of sickness, accidents, or untimely death.  The purpose of National Estate Planning Awareness Week is to encourage consumers to address these issues before they have a chance to negatively impact their daily lives.   Estate planning can include many different areas such as: retirement planning, asset protection planning, beneficiary designations, tax planning, planning for children, taking precautions to  address the risk of future disability, insurance planning, and more.

Locally, several charities are sponsoring a free workshop series titled, “It’s Your Estate.”  The workshops are designed to educate the public in the consumer financial arena and help them take charge of their own money and estate.  Jason C. Morris, Esq.will present on the Advanced Estate Planning topic the week of October 11th – 13th.  Mr. Morris will present at S. Valleys Library, 15650 Wedge Parkway, on October 11 at 2 p.m.  On October 12th, Mr. Morris will present at the North Valley Library, 1075 N. Hills Blvd #340 at 2 p.m.  Thursday, October 13th, Mr. Morris will present at the Sparks Library, 1125 12th Street, at 11:00 a.m. and offer another presentation at the Northwest Reno Library, 2325 Robb Drive, at 2:30 p.m.

For reservations or questions, call the Community Foundation of Western Nevada at 775.333.5499.